To adopt best practices to develop the university in to a world class institution for higher studies and research.
- Develop and implement best practices in education and research
- Train faculty and staff to implement quality at every step
- Monitor the implementation of best practices
- Continuously strive for further improvement
The Quality Enhancement Cell (QEC) is to be headed by a Dean reporting directly to Vice Chancellor/Rector. He is to be the correspondent with the outside bodies. QEC is responsible for:
- Promoting public confidence that the quality and standards of the award of degrees are enhanced and safeguarded.
- Review of quality standards and the quality of teaching and learning in each subject area.
- Review of academic affiliations with other institutions in terms of effective management of standards and quality of programs.
- Defining clear and explicit standards as points of reference to the reviews to be carried out. It should also help the employees to know as to what they could expect from candidates.
- Developing qualifications framework by setting out the attributes and abilities that can be expected from the holder of a qualification, i.e. Master’s, M. Phil. and Doctoral.
- Developing program specifications. These are standard set of information clarifying what knowledge, understanding, skills and other attributes a student will have developed on successfully completing a specific program.
- Developing quality assurance processes and methods of evaluation to affirm that the quality of provision and the standard of awards are being maintained and to foster curriculum, subject and staff development, together with research and other scholarly activities.
- Making sure that the university’s quality assurance procedures are designed to fit in with the arrangements in place nationally for maintaining and improving the quality of Higher Education.
- Developing procedures for the following: Approval of new program
- Annual Monitoring and evaluation including program monitoring, Faculty monitoring, and student perceptions
- Departmental review
- Student feedback
- Employer feedback
- Quality assurance of Master’s, M. Phil and PhD degree programs
- Subject review
- Institutional assessment
- Program specifications